Informations about Final Project

 Blow are eight books's references that I have found in library tonight:

 

Reference

Klotzko, A. J. (2001). The cloning sourcebook. New York: Oxford

University Press, Inc.

Krass, L. R., & Wilson, J. Q. (1998). The ethics of human cloning. Washington

DC: American Enterprise Institute.

President’s Council on Bioethics. (2002). Human cloning and human dignity: An

ethical inquiry. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S.

Government Printing office.

Pence, G. E. (1998). Who’s afraid of human cloning. The United States of      

America: Rowman & Littlefield publishers, Inc.

Roetz, H. (2006). Cross-cultural issues in bioethics: The example of human

cloning. New York: Editions Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam

Barbara, M. K. (2000). Human Cloning. The United States of America: Library of

Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Michael, R. & Aryne, S. (2001). Cloning: responsible science or technomadness?

New York: Prometheus Books.

Gregory, E. P. (2004) Cloning after Dolly: who’s still afraid? The United States

of America: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Here are some sentences that I want to use in my final project:

1. Roetz, a professor who specializes in cross-culture ethics and human rights, he calls human cloning as a reproduction, and it can destroy relationships between parents and children. It can cause strange bonds between natural and unnatural things. It is also an impersonal laboratory procedure (Roetz, 2006).
2. R. Kass and Q. Wilson, a scientist and humanist who specializes in cloning, they give a comprehensive opinion to point out this current situation, they give a disapproval about father-son or mother-daughter twins that are proposed by human cloning (1998). The essence of reproduction is copying parents’ appearance and characteristics to create a child (Kass & Wilson, 1998).
   
3. Arlene Judith, this person who is a lawyer and bioethicist also thinks that it is not fair between humans and nonhuman animals; it is supposed to have a specific or moral principle to manage the experiments of nonhuman animals (Arlene Judith, 2001). 
4. R. Kass and Q. Wilson, they also think the human cloning is not absolutely successful because the males cannot be perfectly cloned while the females can be perfectly cloned (R. Kass & Q. Wilson, 1998). 
5. E. Pence, a professor who teaches medical ethics also opposes human cloning on testing the sex of a child before parturition because it can directly break the connection to sexual differentiation and procreation. It makes no expectation about the child’s birth (E. Pence, 1998).
6. The president's Council on Bioethics, a presidential commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, they also said that the government will not give supports on this research in order to keep society in a healthy and safe condition. Prohibiting human cloning must essentially force them to solve this paradoxical problem (President’s Council on Bioethics, July 2002).
7. Arlene Judith also gives proof of this when she explains that the California statute makes the civil penalties up to ten millions for cloning, in order to prohibit any corporation, firm, clinic, hospital, or research facility from cloning a human being (Arlene Judith, 2001).
8. R. Kass and Q. Wilson also give us an example, President Clinton doesn’t spend any federal funds on human cloning because he doesn’t want to actuate the contradictions between the technical skills and the ethics of society (R. Kass & Q. Wilson, 1998).